HIS 204
TR 11:30-12:45
Dr. Gayle V. Fischer
Office: SB 109B
Office Hours:
978/542-6399
![]()
January
15, 2002
Dear
Class,
Welcome to
HIS 204: US History and Constitutional Government I. During the semester we
will explore the historical development of the United States from contact
through the Civil War. This class will focus on understanding how history is
shaped by human choices, not mainly by impersonal forces of fate. Our journey
through the first half of US history might differ from your previous
experiences in high school and college history courses. With a little trust and
effort on your part, I’m hopeful that you will enjoy the voyage and learn some
history along the way.
I should
probably begin by introducing myself. I’m Gayle V. Fischer and you may call me
Gayle, Dr. Fischer, or Professor Fischer—I have no preference. However, you may
not call me Mrs. Fischer. My undergraduate degree is from the University of
Texas at Austin; I majored in Drama. My Ph.D. in US History is from Indiana
University. My book, Pantaloons and Power,
was published in spring 2001. In addition to being an historian and a
professor, I am a wife and the mother of two boys. I am hearing impaired.
Because of this impairment I wear two hearing aids. However, I also need you to
speak clearly in class, perhaps a hair louder than your usual volume, and
please do not cover your mouth when you speak. I’ve learned to live with this
impairment but it can still embarrass me. The most embarrassing thing is when I
think I’ve heard someone say something that they didn’t say and I start talking
and everyone around me is clueless about what I am talking about. If you find
that I’m going off in some weird direction please let me know, chances are I
misunderstood something someone said. It is more embarrassing for me to keep
talking than to have you correct me. Please be patient if I ask you to repeat
yourself two, three, even four times—some days it is harder to hear than
others. Over the course of the semester, I will not conceal my political views
from you—including my detestation of war and militarism, racial and sexual
inequality, the unfair distribution of the world’s wealth. However, I will
attempt to be fair to other points of view and I strongly encourage you to
disagree with me. I don’t expect my views to be your views but I want us both
to think about why we hold the views we do. That is probably enough information
for now since this letter is about our class, not about me.
The
preceding two paragraphs should have clued you in, but if you haven’t figured
it out yet, let me tell you that this class is different. It is different in a
number of ways. First, the choice of readings for the class; some might
consider some of the books I’ve chosen for the class subversive. I prefer to
think of them as thought provoking. On the other hand, some of you might think
I’ve chosen “children’s books” and might be offended. The “subversive” books
are: Peter Irons, A People’s History of
the Supreme Court; James W. Loewen, Lies
My Teacher Told Me; Matt S. Meier and Feliciano Ribera, Mexican
Americans/American Mexicans; and Howard Zinn, A People’s History of the United States. These books are available
at the SSC bookstore, from your favorite online bookstore, and on reserve in
the library—in fact, since we do not read these books in their entirety, I have
had past students copy the appropriate chapters from the books on reserve
thereby saving themselves some money.
Unfortunately, Irons, Loewen, Meier, Ribera, and Zinn pay little
attention to women and I have included two books on women’s history to correct
this oversight. The “children’s books” are: Jane Kamensky, The Colonial
Mosaic: American Women 1600-1760, and Marylynn Salmon, The Limits
of Independence: American Women 1760-1800. These books are available
at the SSC bookstore and from your favorite online bookstore. The SSC Library
does not own these books and they are not on reserve. Most of the titles used
in this class are fairly popular and you may want to see if they are available through
your local library—another cost-saving measure.
Second, we
will be writing letters to one another. I’m always looking for new ideas to try
in the classroom and an article by Toby Fulwiler, “Writing Back and Forth,”
intrigued me so much that I just had to give it a try. I tried it in my HIS 204
Fall 2001 with great success. Essentially the exercise requires weekly
letters—you write to me, I write back to you. I’ll have more details and the
logistics later in this letter. Third, the history and film projects that you
will do throughout the semester. Again, more details and the logistics later in
this letter. Fourth, attendance and participation are extremely important in
this class. In fact, it is critical that you attend classes if you wish to earn
a decent grade. Finally, you will notice that there is only one exam—the final.
If you are
like most of the students in my classes, one of your first concerns is “how
will I be graded?” Well, quite simply 20% of your grade is based on attendance
and participation, 20% of your grade is based on the weekly letters you submit,
30% of your grade is based on “History 204: A Reflection” essay, and 30% is
based on the history and film project and the final exam.
Let me
explain each of the grading criteria in the order that I presented them above.
Attendance and participation seem self-explanatory but there are a few fine
points that I want to point out. I don’t just want your body in my classroom I
want your mind there as well. That means for the hour and fifteen minutes that
we’re together put aside thoughts of lunch, the babysitter, the boyfriend or
girlfriend and think about the reading you’ve done and what your classmates are
saying. In order to participate you must do the reading—most of our class
sessions will be oriented around discussing the reading, if you haven’t done
the reading, you can’t participate, and if you can’t participate, you earn a
less than decent grade. It goes without saying that you can’t participate if
you are not in class—so Attend. There are some factors that will result
in the lowering of your participation grade, they are: coming to class late,
leaving class early, talking while I am talking, passing notes, and being
disruptive. I know this sounds picky but trust me, these things make for a
disagreeable classroom atmosphere and really irritate me. For a detailed list
see the attached “Participation and Attendance Grading Guidelines.”
Now for
the weekly letters. Each week I invite you to write a letter to me about ideas
related to our readings and class discussions. Make your letter honest, lively,
and personal, while still addressing matters of intellectual and emotional
concern to US history. Twice you will include your classmates as your
audience—you are responsible for making copies for the entire class (The
first letter must be distributed by March 7; the second letter must be
distributed by April 25). I will write a letter back to all of you (the whole
class) each week, distributing it on Thursday so that you will have read it by
Tuesday. In this letter I will address some, but not all of the concerns you
raise collectively in your letters to me. (In fact, I have written this
syllabus as a letter to suggest a possible model for style and form—obviously
given all the information that I have to impart to you this is a rather long
letter, yours do not have to be this long.) The weekly letters are examples of
“good-enough writing,” that is these letters are one-draft writings that make a
good enough case and don’t need to be revised, edited, and worried to death. By
now you are all wondering, “how is she going to count these letters?” I expect
a letter each week (unless the syllabus indicates otherwise); but it’s the
doing of them that counts, not their conventions, content, form, or style.
Exactly what and how you write are your business that you write is mine. But,
believe me, your reactions to the readings, class discussion, movie projects,
as well as anything else related to the course helps me teach better. The only
requirement in addition to writing the letters is that you submit a typewritten/word-processed
letter every Tuesday on paper. My experience is that e-mail letters differ
greatly from paper letters and I want the letters for this class to be paper
letters. Letters MUST be submitted the week that they are due; the
letter due week 6 cannot be turned in week 9 and still receive credit. I
will not return your letters to you; you MUST keep a copy of the letters you
write or you will not be able to complete the “History 204: A Reflection”
essay.
More on
weekly letters: The letters I received last semester ran the gamut from awesome
to disappointing. Students noticed this disparity in the letters their
classmates distributed to the class. It worried some that awesome letters
counted as much as poor quality letters and suggested grading letters to give
those who took the assignment more seriously more credit. However, grading the
letters undermines the point of the letters. For those of you who take the
letter-writing assignment seriously take heart: poor quality letters produced
poor quality final essays that in turn earned poor grades.
A further
guide (or possible letter material): you might consider these questions as you
read and incorporating them into your letters:
1) What is the major argument
of each reading? How does the author support that argument?
2) Does one reading help you
understand another reading better? How?
3) What are the contradictions
or points of tension between the various readings? Can you explain these
contradictions? (Mark passages that seem to be contradicting other passages.)
4) Are there passages that are
particularly interesting to you? Are there passages that are confusing or that
you think require more explanation? What are they? (Mark them so you can find
them in class.)
5) How familiar or foreign does
the world the readings describe seem to you?
6) What additional questions do
the readings raise for you?
7) What would you like to talk
about in the class discussion?
One more
thing about weekly letters: I am trying to figure out a way to incorporate
effectively the letters into class discussion. If any of you have any
suggestions please suggest.
Thirty
percent of your final grade is based on “History 204: A Reflection” essay. In
the “History 204: A Reflection” essay I expect to see more focused, deliberate,
and crafted writing examining themes, patterns, and concerns of a semester’s
worth of correspondence. For this assignment, re-read all of your
letters, your classmates’ letters, and my letters, review your class and
reading notes, look for recurring themes, patterns, and concerns. “History 204:
A Reflection” reflects on what you have learned over the course of the semester
using the various class letters as primary sources. You must quote and cite
letters in your essay. Conventions, content, form, and style “count” in this
assignment; see separate grading rubric You may turn in two or three pages of a
draft of the essay on April 11 or before. I will not grade the draft but I will
make comments that should help you improve the essay. “History 204: A
Reflection” is due the last day of class, May 2, 2002.
The
remaining thirty percent of your grade is based on the film project that you
will be doing outside the classroom and the final exam. You will be assigned a
film drawn at random from the pool—depending on the size of the class, some of
you may end up viewing the same film. You will also be required to locate at
least one primary source that complements your film. You must analyze the
assigned film as history and compare its portrayal of the past to the academic
representation of history presented in class, in texts, in the primary sources
you locate, and in other sources. In your comparisons, you must utilize
critical and scholarly resources and present your conclusions in a four to six
page paper. Unfortunately, the SSC Library film collection is quite limited and
most of you will have to check your local libraries or favorite video stores
for these films. You will all receive the pamphlet, “History Written With Lightning,”
by Paul B. Weinstein, Wayne College, which outlines the rationale for using
commercial film as a historical tool and describes specific elements to be
examined for accuracy, such as costumes, sets, chronology, and behaviors. Due
dates are staggered throughout the semester. You are also required to give a
15-minute presentation on your film—five minutes of the presentation should be
an excerpt from the film. A few basic questions all of your
papers/presentations must address: How does the film’s presentation of history
compare with the scholarly history you have researched? How does the film
content relate to course content? Are the ideas and values consistent with
those we are studying? Overall, does the film present an accurate picture of
history? Is the film effective? Does it capture the feel of the period? Does it
present a convincing portrait of times past? Does it make you feel as though
you are experiencing history? The final exam is scheduled for Tuesday, May 7,
2002, 8:30-10:30am. The final exam question will be distributed on the last day
of class and we will meet during our designated exam period to discuss your
answers. If you have taken class from me before or have talked to others who
have taken classes from me then you know I hate exams. However, I have come up
with a really great final exam that will be interesting for me to read and for
you to write—trust me. As long as you keep up with the class, the exam will not
present any problems for you and you might actually enjoy it.
State law requires
that I include the equal access statement in my syllabus: "Salem State
College is committed to providing equal access to the educational experience
for all students in compliance with Section 504 of The Rehabilitation Act and The Americans with Disabilities Act
and to providing all reasonable academic accommodations, aids and
adjustments. Any student who has a
documented disability requiring an accommodation, aid or adjustment should
speak with the instructor immediately.
Students with Disabilities who have not previously done so should
provide documentation to and schedule an appointment with the Office for
Students with Disabilities and obtain appropriate services."
![]()
Rather
than placing our course schedule in paragraph form for convenience’s sake I
have listed the assignments below. All assigned reading should be completed by
Tuesday, unless otherwise stated:
Week
1: January
15: Introduction & write first letter to Gayle; distribute “History Written
With
Lightning,”
January 17: Discuss “History Written With Lightning,” distribute
film assignments
Week
2: January
22 & 24: Contact
Read: Loewen, “Introduction,” and “1493: The True Importance of
Christopher Columbus;” Zinn, “Columbus, the Indians, and Human Progress;” Meier
and Ribera, “The Meeting of Two Worlds.”
Don’t forget to give Gayle letter #2 on Tuesday
Week
3: January
29 & 31: Colonial “United States”
Read: Loewen, “The Truth About the First Thanksgiving;” Zinn, “Drawing
the Color Line,” and “Persons of Mean and Vile Condition;” Irons,
“Introduction,” and “’Morally Sinful by the Word of God.’”
Letter #3 due on Tuesday
Week
4: February
5 & 7: Colonial “United States” continued
Read: Kamensky, The Colonial Mosaic—ALL
Letter #4 due on Tuesday
Week
5: February
12: Contact/Colonization in Film
*Movie Projects/Presentations: Plymouth Adventure;
The Crucible; Black Robe; Broken Chain; Drums Along the Mohawk
February
14: Revolution
Read: Zinn, “Tyranny is Tyranny;” Meier and Ribera, “Revolution and
Disarray;” Salmon, The Limits of Independence—ALL
Letter #5 due on Tuesday
Have
you written a letter to your classmates yet? Don’t put it off too long.
*Movie Projects/Presentations: 1776; Last of the Mohicans;
Mary Silliman’s War; The Patriot
Read: Irons, Chapter Two, “’The Exigencies of the Union’” to and
including Chapter Seven, “’The Nauseous Project of Amendments.’”
Letter #6 due on Tuesday (include comments on week 5 and 6 film
presentations)
Week
8: March 5
& 7: The Constitution and The Early National Period
Read: Zinn, “A Kind of Revolution;” Irons, Chapter Eight, “’The Court
is Now Sitting,’” to and including Chapter Twelve, “’Great, Good, and Excellent
Man!’”
Letter #7 due on Tuesday
Midterm
attendance/participation forms/grades distributed
If you have not turned in your first letter to the
class you MUST do so this week or you will NOT get full credit for the letter
writing exercise
Spring
Break March 12 &14
Week
9: March 19
& 21: Oppression
Read: Loewen, “Red Eyes;” Zinn, “As Long as Grass Grows or Water Runs,”
and “The Intimately Oppressed.”
Letter #8 due on Tuesday
Week
10: March
26 & 28: Manifest Destiny
Read: Meier and Ribera, “Man and Land on the Frontier” through “Roots
of the Poison.”
Letter #9 due on Tuesday
Have
you written a second letter to your classmates yet? Don’t put it off too long.
Read: Loewen, “’Gone With the Wind’: The Invisibility of Racism;” Zinn,
“We Take Nothing by Conquest, Thank God,” and “Slavery Without Submission,
Emancipation without Freedom.”
Letter #10 due on Tuesday
Week
12: April 9
& 11: Early National and Antebellum United States in Film
*Movie Projects/Presentations: Jeremiah Johnson; Jefferson in
Paris; The Buccaneer; Tecumseh: The Last Warrior; The
Alamo; Gone With the Wind; Beloved
Optional: You may turn in 2 or 3 pages of a draft of
“History 204 Letters: A Reflection.”
Week
13: April
16 & 18: The Approaching Civil War
Read: Loewen, “John Brown and Abraham Lincoln;” Irons, “’A Small,
Pleasant-Looking Negro,’” to and through “’Another Explosion will Soon Come.”
Letter #11 due on Tuesday (include comments on the previous week’s film
presentations)
Have
you written a second letter to your classmates yet? The semester is almost
over.
Week
14: April
23 & 25: Civil War
Read: Zinn, “The Other Civil War,” Irons, “’A Higher Law than the
Constitution’” to and including “’An Evil Eye and an Unequal Hand.’”
Letter #12 due on Tuesday
If you have not turned in your second letter to the class you MUST do
so this week or you will NOT get full credit for the letter writing exercise
Week
15: April
30: Civil War Films
*Movie Projects/Presentations: Santa Fe Trail; Abe Lincoln in
Illinois; Red Badge of Courage; Glory
May
2: Finish Civil War
“History 204: A Reflection” DUE May 2
Final Exam question distributed May 2
As
you can see, we have a full schedule for this semester.
Sincerely,
Gayle
![]()
Much
of the work we do in the classroom in History 204 depends upon you and your
active participation. You must:
1.
Be
prepared for class
2.
Be
on time for class
3.
Contribute
to a positive atmosphere in the classroom by including and working with others
and encouraging open discussion
4.
Participate
actively in class discussions by asking relevant questions, sharing personal
experiences, and listening to the viewpoints of others
5.
Help
maintain the focus of the class and group focus
6.
Demonstrate
an understanding of course information
7.
Take
risks in presenting personal opinions, original ideas, and asking questions
8.
Go
beyond the minimum requirements for assignments
9.
Maintain
a usable notebook containing assignments, due dates, relevant class
information, etc.
10.
Accept
and give constructive criticism
11.
Demonstrate
a respect for the physical environment of the classroom
12.
Attempt
to grow personally by demonstrating academic growth based on class learning
activities
13.
Take
personal responsibility for absenteeism—anticipating problems, making up work,
etc.
14.
Attend
and actively participate with thoughtful questions when classmates present
their movie projects
Grading:
Proficiency in all….A
Proficiency in eleven….B
Proficiency in seven….D
![]()
January
15, 2002
Dear
Gayle,
“I,
______________________________(your name), give you permission to use my name
and to quote me in the letters you write to the class. When I write passages too private for
publication I will write “not available for publication” and make it clear
which passages are not available for publication.
Introduce
yourself in the space below and please comment on history courses you’ve taken
in the past, what you like and don’t like about history.