Streams II: Classifications
|
 |
Terms: influent, effluent,
perennial, intermittent, ephemeral, loosing and gaining streams,
channel habit or pattern, straight, braided, anabranching (anastomosing)
meandering, point bar, thalweg, longitudinal bar, cutbank, cutoff,
pool, riffle, oxbow lake, natural levee, backswamp, suspended-load
channel, mixed-load channel, bedload channel, helical flow, hydraulic
geometry, graded stream, steady state equilibrium, stream power,
dynamic equilibrium, aggradation, degradation, transport limited,
supply limited, youth, mature, old age, William Morris Davis, consequent,
antecedent, subsequent, insequent, superimposed.
How well do you know your terms? Crossword: Interactive
Web version / PDF |
Classic Fluvial Classification Systems
Terms derived from these classifications are used frequently in
geology, so take time to become familiar with them. All
of these classifications are based on one or more concepts or characteristics
of a stream that reflect process and behavior. The Rosgen method
(Rosgen and Silvey, 1996) presented at the end of this section,
incorporates those attributes measurable in the field to the classification
of streams. Because of it systematic approach and usefulness
when comparing different stream types, most governmental and environmental
agencies use the Rosgen method of stream classification.
- *Constancy of flow
- *Contribution to or from the groundwater table
- *Downstream gains or losses in flow
- Channel morphology
- Channel composition
- Equilibrium conditions
- Depositional or erosional regime
- Genetic classification
Perennial streams flow all year around because their
channels are in constant contact with the groundwater table. Most well
developed streams in New England are perennial.
Intermittent (seasonal) streams flow continuously
only during certain seasons when the groundwater table is high. Fingertip
tributaries are often intermittent.
Ephemeral streams, such as arroyos in the western
U.S., never intersect the water table and therefore flow only when
it rains. Gullies and rills are ephemeral channels as are canyons in
arid regions where the ground water table is very deep. Back
to fcs
Influent streams contribute water to the groundwater
table. They are a type of loosing stream (see below) because
discharge decreases downstream as water percolates into the bed.
Effluent streams receive water from the groundwater
table. Perennial streams are effluent all year around whereas
intermittent streams are influent or effluent on a seasonal basis. Back
to fcs
Loosing stream: A stream that experiences a downstream
decrease in discharge.
The tendency is for streams to increase discharge downstream as
their drainage networks expand. However, there are a
number of condition that will cause streamflow to decrease, such
as climate, water usage, and depth
of water table. The Niger and Nile rivers
progress from humid to arid regions where there is less recharge
and greater evaporation, therefore their overall discharge decreases
downstream. The low discharge of the Colorado River
as it enters Mexico results from withdrawal of water for metropolitan
areas. Arroyos and
distributaries on arid alluvial fans loose water through percolation
into the bed.
Niger
River NASA visible earth, URL http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/view_rec.php?id=2243
Nile
River NASA URL: http://earth.jsc.nasa.gov/debrief/ISS002/nileFiles/ISS002-701-10.htm
Colorado
River NASA Earth Observatory, URL: http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/EarthObservatory/ColoradoRiverDeltaBajaCalifornia.htm
gaining stream: A stream experiencing increased discharge
downstream. Most effluent streams are gaining streams. Back
to fcs
Alluvial channels can be classified by the type of load composing their
channel:
- Suspended-load channel: <3% of particle load is bedload
- Mixed-load channel: 3-11% is bedload
- Bed-load channel: >11% is bedload Back to
fcs
Classification of (stable) Alluvial Channels based on channel composition
Channel Sediment and Mode
of sediment transport |
Bedload (% total load) |
Width/Depth ratio |
gradient |
sinuosity |
| Suspended Load |
<3% |
<10 |
relatively gentle |
>2 |
| Mixed Load |
3-11 |
10-40 |
moderate |
1.3-2 |
| Bed Load |
>11 |
>40 |
relatively steep |
<1.3 |
Stream channels can
have a variety of patterns, or habits,
which depend on the following factors (Church, 1992):
- The variability of discharge supplied
from upstream
- The volume and caliber of
the sediment entering the channel
- The slope (gradient) of
the channel
Although there are numerous variations and
combinations of channel patterns, the basic patterns described
here are straight, meandering, braided and anabranching. Predominantly single-thread
streams are described as either straight, sinuous (gently
meandering), or meandering by their sinuosity ratio--the
channel length divided by valley length (as defined by Allen,
1970).
Straight segments in alluvial
streams are rare, but common to bedrock-controlled channels and
steep mountain slopes, such as those in a parallel drainage (see
rills on Pinatubo). A straight alluvial stream typically
has a suspended-load channel, low gradient, sluggish flow, and
very little load. Although the channel is straight there
is as with all channels a tendency for the flow to oscillate
from side-to-side. The thalweg of
a stream marks the line of maximum depth and flow velocity and
wanders from bank to bank.
Meandering streams may have
gentle (sinuous) bends to broadly looping channels, which strongly
reflect channel load. A highly meandering stream typically has
a cohesive, suspended-load channel and low flow velocity. As
bedload increases channels become less sinuous, bars develop,
the width to depth ratio increases and eventually braiding occurs.
Features of Meandering and
sinuous channels
Point bars, riffles, cutbanks
and pools are characteristic features of both sinuous
and meandering channels. Flow is focused on the outside
of meander bends
as the thalweg travels from bank to bank. Erosion ensues forming
a cutbank fronted by a deep pool. Helical
flow then |

Figure 7. Sinuosity ratio as defined by Allen (1970).

Figure 8. Features of a meandering stream. |
transports the eroded sediment downstream where it's
deposited in the low velocity zone on the inside bank of the next meander.
Such accumulations are called pointbar deposits. Meander
inflections, or crossovers, often contain shallow riffles,
particularly in gravel streams. A meander bend can become isolated
when opposing cutbanks on a broadly looping meander intersect. The
intersection is called a meander cuttoff and the isolated
meander segment an oxbow
lake. A chute cuttoffs occurs when a new channel
is carved through the neck by a flood. Avulsion is
the periodic switching or relocation of a channel.
Why do streams meander?
This is a two part question, neither of which has a universally accepted
answer.
1. What mechanisms are responsible for meander formation?
A popular hypothesis is that sediment failure into a channel will
deflect the flow thereby initiating an oscillatory pattern that will
generate meander formation downstream. This likely occurs but
doesn't explain meandering channels in rock or the surface of glaciers. Another
hypotheses suggests that meandering is generated by eddies or vortices
form in respond to bed irregularities.
2. Why do stream meander?
Meandering helps a stream balance energy. Meander formation
reduces channel gradient (Δe/L), which governs the rate at which
PE is transferred to KE (stream power). When a stream has more energy
than it can dissipate through turbulence and sediment transport it
will carve meanders to reduce its gradient and stream power.
 |
Figure 9. Various types of cutoffs. Meander cutoffs
and the formation of oxbow lakes are largely restricted to suspended
load channels with broad looping meanders. |
Braided channel: woven channel
Braided streams contains numerous longitudinal bars which
force the channel to bifurcate into numerous ever-changing threads. The
bars are covered during high flows and emerge during low flows forming
a braided plain. Braided channels typically have
high bedload, variable discharge, and poorly vegetated, easily eroded
banks. Glacial outwash streams are braided because of their high
sediment load and seasonally variable discharge. A meandering stream
can become locally braided in reaction to a sudden influx of sediment
from a bank or tributary.
Properties
of meandering vs. braided streams |
Characteristics |
Meandering (fig. 8) |
Braided (fig. 9) |
*Discharge (Q) |
stable-moderately variable |
highly variable |
*Load |
suspended > bedload |
high bedload |
*Bank erodibility |
low to moderate |
high |
*Bank composition |
clay, till, or silt |
sand, gravel |
*Bank vegetation |
good |
poor |
channel gradient |
moderate-to-low |
moderate-to-high |
Width/Depth |
low |
high |
Table 3. Varying characteristic between meandering and braided
channels. An * marks causative characteristics.
|
Figure 10. Meandering Yukon River, Yukon flats northeastern
Alaska. Note the oxbow lakes and successive point bar deposits.
From Oil and Gas Assessment of Yukon Flats, East-Central Alaska,
2004, U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2004-3121 2004
|
| Figure 11. Braided channel of the Platte River in
Central Nebraska. Note the longitudinal bars in the channel.
from Zelt and Frankforter Water-Quality
Assessment of the Central Nebraska Basins?\Entering a New Decade,
U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 013-03
|
Anabranching (Anastomosing or multichannelled):
These streams appear superficially similar to braided streams except
the bars or islands are not formed by contemporaneous deposition but
by erosion. Anabranching streams have more than one
channel separated by stable vegetated islands that are rarely covered
during floods.
Braided and Anabranching Channels
 |
 |
| Figure 11. Braided streams contain mobile bars that are covered
during flooding and emerge during low flow. |
Figure 12. Anabranching (Anastomosing) rivers have more than
one permanent channels that flow around stable islands. |
Exercises:
- Evaluate the characteristics that are marked with an asterisk
(*). Describe the influence each characteristic might have
on determining whether a stream is braided or meandering.
- Using Wikimapia or
Google Earth and an atlas, if necessary, locate and identify
an example of a meandering, braided, and anastomosing river.
- Look at the Bramaputra
River in Tibet (NASA Earth Observatory image ID 6260,
URL: http://earthobsrvatory.nasa.gov/eNewsroom/NewImages/images.php3?img_id=6260)
and answer the following questions:
a. What is it's channel pattern. What features
does it display that supports your interpretation?
b. What explanation(s) can you offer to explain its pattern?
|
Graded Stream (steady state; balanced, regime)
The characteristics of a stream's channel reflects the balance between
the available energy (discharge and gradient) and the work required
to move water and sediment through the channel. For example, if the
stream is out of balance then it will make the following adjustments.
- channel scouring: Results = lowers gradient, increases
depth and/or width and decreases velocity
- deposition: Results = increases gradient and increases
velocity, thereby facilitating bedload transport
The table below outlines the variables that can and can't be adjusted
by a stream.
Independent Variables
(Streams cannot adjust these) |
Semidependent variables
(Variables that interact) |
Dependent
(dependent on all others) |
Discharge entering the channel
Sediment load entering the channel
Ultimate base level |
channel width
channel depth
bed roughness (bedforms)
grain size of load (what it picks up)
channel pattern |
slope (adjusted through erosion, deposition, or changing sinuosity) |
| Stream Power per unit area of the
bed = pgQ/w = pgdvs |
An alluvial stream which regulates its various parameters (depth,
width, slope, velocity, etc.) to obtain the most efficient conditions
for flow and sediment transport is known as a graded stream.
A graded stream therefore is capable of maintaining a steady-state conditions
over time, primarily over time intervals perceived by humans. Below
are two views of equilibrium. The view on the left is of graded
stream or reach as perceived on a yearly basis. The stream erodes
and deposits about a mean value and appears to be in a steady-state
condition. However, over the long interval of geologic time most
streams are progressively eroding the landscape. Dynamic
equilibrium involves fluctuations about a moving average. At
present streams are still recovering from changes in sea level, sediment
influx, and climate change following glaciation.
Views of Equilibrium
 |
| Figure 13. Perception of equilibrium depend on the time
scale considered. Over the short period streams and channel
reaches appear to be in a steady-state equilibrium (left), but
in fact are changing over millions of years (right). |
Characteristics of the profile of a graded (steady state) stream
or reach:
- Slope of the longitudinal profile is concave upward, increasing exponentially
upstream. Because sediment up stream is coarse and flow is less,
a steeper slopes and greater kinetic energy are required to transport
it. (Potential energy is transferred to kinetic energy at a faster
rate along a steep gradient).
- No falls or basins exist within the profile.
- No net erosion or deposition occurs along its channel. (Input = Output)
- The stream is capable of handling all sediment introduced to it from
its tributaries. (Input = Output)
Non-graded stream
Energy is not evenly distributed along the profile of a non-graded
stream as evidenced by the presence of falls and basins.
Falls result in a concentration of energy, which promotes erosion,
while basins result in a decrease in energy, which promotes deposition.
*Questions to ponder: There are very few streams in New England
that would be considered to be graded. Why? |
Back to fcs
Changes in basel level will cause a stream to either deposit (aggrade)
or erode (degrade) it's channel. An increase in
base level, such as that caused by subsidence, damming, or rising sea
level will reduce the gradient and cause a stream to deposit sediment. A
lowering of base level will cause incision, or entrenching (e.g.
the Goosenecks of the San Juan). One
of the best examples of a non-regime stream is the Colorado River. Uplift
of the Colorado Plateau, along with other factors, initiated incision
5-3 ma. More recently, construction of of the Grand Canyon and Hoover
dams have created local base levels that not only promote deposition
upstream, but erosion downstream. Discharge at the mouth has been
so reduced that sediment no longer reaches the delta plain. Ultimately,
If total stream power is greater than that required to transport the
sediment provided it (supply limited), then the stream
will erode. If stream power is less (transport limited)
than that required the stream will aggrade.
Total power available for erosion is decreased by:
- decreasing the gradient through erosion
- decreasing gradient by increasing base level (e.g. rising
sea level, damming, subsidence, etc)
- increasing sediment discharge from tributaries (transporting sediment
expends energy)
- decreasing discharge (climatic changes, withdrawal or diversion
of water by man, percolation of water through stream bed, etc).
Questions to ponder: Why does a dam typically results in
deposition above it and erosion below it? Why is the Nile River delta
eroding?
|
Aggradational (depositional)
|
Degradational (erosional)
|
flat floored valley, smooth profile |
V-shaped
valleys; terraces many be present if previously aggrading
or if experiencing sporadic uplift, contains falls or stepped
profile |
thick alluvial cover, much of which is too deep for the stream
to scour |
bedrock channel or very thin alluvial cover. Exceptions
would be if previously aggrading. |
Natural levees,
*backswamp deposits, yazoo tributaries, and meander scrolls are
common in well developed systems
note: *backswamp deposits are replaced by salt flats in arid
regions. |
poorly developed or absent |
Table 4. Characteristics of Aggradational and degradational
river valleys. |
 |
| Figure 14. Generalized cross-sections and profiles
of non-regime (degradational and aggradational) and regime (equilibrium)
states. |
Back to fcs
- Consequent stream: developed as a consequence of regional
tilting. Consequent streams follow the regional slope.
- Subsequent stream: A secondary, structurally controlled drainage
developed independently of the primary consequent drainage.
- Superimposed stream: Stream pattern developed on an overlying
rock sequence (e.g. horizontal strata) that is superimposed and maintained
on an underlying, structurally different series of rocks (e.g. folded
strata).
- Captured
stream or drainage: A stream or drainage
system that is diverted and incorporated into an adjoining basin. Captured
streams typically have tributaries that are barbed.
- Obsequent stream: A stream that locally flows opposite to
the regional slope.
- Antecedent stream: A stream that was established prior to
the growth of the structure across which it cuts. The stream was able
to maintain its course as the structure was uplifted.
- Insequent stream: A stream developed entirely through the
processes of headward erosion.
Back to fcs
William Morris Davis (1850-1934), physical
geographer and Harvard Professor, developed several theories of landscape
evolution including a fluvial cycle where he envisioned the progressive
evolution of streams from youthful to old age. Each stage was defined
by particular morphologic elements.

Figure 14. Davisian evolution of a stream.
|
- Youthful (initial): Narrow v-shaped valley, no floodplain,
steep gradient
- Mature (intermediate): broad valley with flood plain,
meandering stream, lower gradient
- Old Age (terminal): river meanders over a broad plain
with oxbow lakes, stream gradient of very low
- Rejuvenation: change in base level renews youthful
conditions
|
Rosgen method of stream classification is a three
tiered system that sorts streams into major categories within
the setting of the landscape from the fingertip tributary to the main
valley trunk. Measureable
attributes such as channel pattern sinuosity, slope entrenchment, and
width/depth ratio are all used to determine stream type.
Read:
Fundamentals
of the Rosgen Stream Classification System- Module assembled
by the EPA based on Rosgen, D.L. and H.L. Silvey (1996).
Guide to field techniques: - The whys and hows to stream-related
field studies
Harrelson, Cheryl C; Rawlins, C. L.; Potyondy, John P., 1994, Stream
channel reference sites: an illustrated guide to field technique: Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station.
61 p.
Back to fcs
Allen, J.R.L., 1970, Physical processes of sedimentation: Earth Science
Series No. 1, Elsevier, New York, 248 p
Bloom, Arthur. 2004, Geomorphology, A systematic analysis of Late Cenozoic
Landforms, (4th edition): Waveland
Press Inc., Longe Grove , IL 482 p.
Chorley, Richard J., 1969, Introduction to fluvial processes:
Methuen and Co. Ltd., London, 218 pp.
Chorley, R. J., Schumm, S. A., Sugden, D. E., 1984, Geomorphology:
Methuen and Co. Ltd., London, 605 p.
Church, M., 1992, Channel morphology and typology, in
The Rivers Handbook: Hydrological and Ecological Principles, edited by
P. Calow and G. Petts, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 126-143
Easterbrook, Donald J., 1993, Surface Processes and Landforms:
Macmillan Pub. Co., 520 p.
Gilbert, G. K., 1877, Report on the geology of the Henry
Mts., Utah: U.S. Geographical and Geological Survey, Rocky Mt. Region,
U.S. Govt. Printing Office. Washington, D.C., 160 p. Hart, M. G., 1986,
Geomorphology pure and applied: George Allen And Unwin,
Boston MA, 227 p.
Hickin, E. J., 1974. The development of meanders in natural river channels,
Amer. J. Sci., v. 274, p. 414-442.
Horton, R. E., 1935, Erosional development of streams
and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology:
Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, v. 56, pp. 273-370.
Howard, A.D., 1967, Drainage analysis in geologic interpretation:
a summation: The Amer. Assoc. of Petr. Geol., v. 51, n. 11, p. 2246-2259.
Langbein and Schumm, 1958, Yield of sediment in relation
to mean annual precipitation: Trans. Am. Geophys. Un., v. 39, p. 1079-1084
Leopold, L. B., and Maddock, T., 1953, The hydraulic
geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications: U.S. Geological
Survey Professional Patter 252, 57 p.
Leopold, L. B., Wolman, M. G. and Miller, J.P., 1964,
Fluvial processes in geomorphology: Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 522
p.
Montgomery, D. R., and Buffington, J. M., 1997, Channel-reach
morphology in mountain drainage basins: GSA Bulletin, v. 109, no.5, p.
579-611.
Morisawa, Marie, 1988, The Geological Society of America
Bulletin and the development of quantitative geomorphology: GSA Bulletin,
v. 100, p. 1016-1022.
Morisawa, Marie, 1985, Rivers: Longman
Inc., New York, 222 p.
Knighton, David, 1998, Fluvial Forms and Processes, A
New Perspective: Oxford University Press Inc., New York, NY 383 p.
Rosgen, D.L. and H.L. Silvey. 1996: Applied River Morphology.
Wildland Hydrology Books, Fort Collins, CO.
Ritter, D. F., Kochel, C. R., and Miller, J. R., Process
Geomorphology (3rd Edition): Wm .C. Brown Publishers, Dubuque, IA, 544
p.
Roberts, Andre, 2003, River Processes, Oxford University
Press, Inc, New York, NY, 214 p.
Smith and Smith, 1984, Williams River: An outstanding
example of channel widening and braiding caused by bed-load addition: Geology,
v. 12, p. 78-82.
Strahler, A. N.,1952, Dynamic basis of geomorphology:
Geological Society of America Bulletin, 63, pp. 923-938
Summerfield, M. A., 1991, Global Geomorphology. John
Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 536 p.
Thornbury, William D., 1969, Principles
of Geomorphology (2nd edition): Wiley and Sons, New York 594 p.
Schumm, Stanley A., 2005, River Variability and Complexity,
Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 220p.
Streams Part 1: Introduction / Streams
Part 2: Classifications /Streams
Part 3: Drainage Basins
Lindley
Hanson/Department
of Geological Sciences/Salem
State College/Geomorphology/GeoIndex/QkRef
|